 |
Intel Core i5-13400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS |
|
Processor comparisons 12-10-2022
For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, AIDA64, RealBench, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, MATLAB, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, SuperPi, 7zip, Prime95, PassMark, Furmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS or Intel Core i5-13400.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400 | 59% |
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | 56% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400 is 5% better than Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400 | 56% |
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | 55% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 100.3 | 97.9 | | Valorant | 114.0 | 111.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.8 | 62.3 | | Apex Legends | 107.1 | 104.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.5 | 83.4 | | Overwatch | 92.3 | 90.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.6 | 76.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.0 | 55.6 | | Warzone | 88.9 | 86.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 95.7 | 93.4 | | Valheim | 94.6 | 92.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400 | 91% |
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | 152% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 276 | 310 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2844 | 2997 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 457 | 721 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6319 | 6571 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1603 | 1789 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18171 | 18285 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | | Single-Core | 1465 | 3995 | | Multi-Core | 30969 | 21962 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | | Single-Core | 1786 | 1598 | | Multi-Core | 12045 | 9688 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13400 |
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS | | Announcement date | September 23, 2022 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FP7 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rembrandt | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 13 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 7200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 512KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS is 21% better than Core i5-13400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400 has 2 more core than Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS is better: 13
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13400 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-12700HL
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i7-12800HL
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
