|
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 vs Intel Core i5-13400 |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 vs Intel Core i5-13400 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing, programming. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Gears 5, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, PassMark, Blender, MATLAB, 3DMark, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, PCMark 10, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-13400 or AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | 58% |
Core i5-13400 | 59% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400 is 1% better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | 56% |
Core i5-13400 | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 99.5 | 100.3 | Valorant | 113.0 | 114.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.3 | 63.8 | Apex Legends | 106.3 | 107.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.8 | 85.5 | Overwatch | 91.6 | 92.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.0 | 78.6 | DOOM Eternal | 56.5 | 57.0 | Warzone | 88.2 | 88.9 | Assassin's Creed | 95.0 | 95.7 | Valheim | 93.8 | 94.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | 91% |
Core i5-13400 | 91% |
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 269 | 276 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2559 | 2844 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 618 | 457 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5606 | 6319 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1564 | 1603 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14925 | 18171 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Single-Core | 3410 | 1465 | Multi-Core | 28192 | 30969 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Single-Core | 1789 | 1786 | Multi-Core | 11256 | 12045 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
Intel Core i5-13400 | Announcement date | September 21, 2022 | September 23, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Vermeer | Raptor Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 5 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 8 | 10 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | | 68 GB/s | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | 4MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 32MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000832
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is 26% better than Core i5-13400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400 has 2 more core than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400 is better: 27 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Intel Core i5-13400 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-13400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|