|
Intel Core i5-13400 vs Intel Core i5-12490F |
|
Processor comparisons 08-10-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-13400 vs Intel Core i5-12490F tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, 7zip, PCMark 10, RealBench, VeraCrypt, PassMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Gears 5, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Blender, SuperPi, Furmark, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12490F or Intel Core i5-13400.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13400 | 59% |
Core i5-12490F | 58% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400 is 1% better than Core i5-12490F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13400 | 56% |
Core i5-12490F | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Control, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.3 | 97.4 | Valorant | 114.0 | 110.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.8 | 62.0 | Apex Legends | 107.1 | 104.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.5 | 83.1 | Overwatch | 92.3 | 89.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.6 | 76.4 | DOOM Eternal | 57.0 | 55.4 | Warzone | 88.9 | 86.4 | Assassin's Creed | 95.7 | 93.0 | Valheim | 94.6 | 91.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13400 | 91% |
Core i5-12490F | 99% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-12490F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13400 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i5-12490F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 276 | 351 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2844 | 2602 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 457 | 849 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6319 | 5918 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1603 | 1993 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18171 | 19522 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i5-12490F | Single-Core | 1465 | 4680 | Multi-Core | 30969 | 27334 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i5-12490F | Single-Core | 1786 | 1938 | Multi-Core | 12045 | 9261 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400 |
Intel Core i5-12490F | Announcement date | September 23, 2022 | January 07, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 10 | 6 | Threads | 16 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 7.5 МБ | L3 cache | 16 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-12490F is 16% better than Core i5-13400 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13400 has 4 more core than Core i5-12490F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12490F is better: 11 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13400 and Intel Core i5-12490F before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-12490F Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|