|
Intel Core i9-10900KF vs Intel Xeon Gold 6130T |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-10900KF vs Intel Xeon Gold 6130T and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, WPrime, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Blender, 3DMark, RealBench, PassMark, Blender. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6130T or Intel Core i9-10900KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
Xeon Gold 6130T | 56% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10900KF is 1% better than Xeon Gold 6130T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
Xeon Gold 6130T | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.4 | 110.1 | Valorant | 115.2 | 125.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 70.1 | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 117.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 93.9 | Overwatch | 93.3 | 101.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 86.4 | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 62.6 | Warzone | 89.9 | 97.6 | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 105.1 | Valheim | 95.6 | 103.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-10900KF | 39% |
Xeon Gold 6130T | 26% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900KF is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6130T since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 234 | 161 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2677 | 2296 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 539 | 314 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6399 | 5359 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1418 | 762 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17325 | 21485 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | Single-Core | 3105 | 1681 | Multi-Core | 23797 | 21868 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | Single-Core | 1471 | 1004 | Multi-Core | 13125 | 21694 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-10900KF |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Comet Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 2.1 MHz | Cores | 10 | 16 | Threads | 20 | 32 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 125 W | Memory type | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 768 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 22 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900KF is 43% better than Xeon Gold 6130T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon Gold 6130T has 6 more core than Core i9-10900KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900KF is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6130T is better: 19 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-10900KF and Intel Xeon Gold 6130T before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-10900KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Xeon Gold 6130T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|