 |
Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i9-10900KF and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like SuperPi, UserBenchmark, PassMark, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Prime95, AIDA64, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, RealBench, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900KF or Intel Core i3-13300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300 | 59% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300 is 3% better than Core i9-10900KF. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300 | 54% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Control, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 101.4 | | Valorant | 109.4 | 115.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 64.5 | | Apex Legends | 102.8 | 108.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.0 | 86.4 | | Overwatch | 88.6 | 93.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 79.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 57.6 | | Warzone | 85.3 | 89.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.9 | 96.8 | | Valheim | 90.8 | 95.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300 | 95% |
Core i9-10900KF | 39% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300 is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900KF since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 296 | 234 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2849 | 2677 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 477 | 539 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6299 | 6399 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1615 | 1418 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18070 | 17325 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1479 | 3105 | | Multi-Core | 30781 | 23797 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1858 | 1471 | | Multi-Core | 8100 | 13125 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 10 | | Threads | 12 | 20 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900KF is 18% better than Core i3-13300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900KF has 2 more core than Core i3-13300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900KF is better: 22
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300 and Intel Core i9-10900KF before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-10900KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
