 |
Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i9-10900KF tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PCMark 10, SuperPi, PassMark, Gears 5, Prime95, MATLAB, 7zip, 3DMark, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, UserBenchmark, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Fortnite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900KF or Intel Core i5-13400F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13400F | 59% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13400F is 3% better than Core i9-10900KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13400F | 57% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 100.6 | 101.4 | | Valorant | 114.3 | 115.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.0 | 64.5 | | Apex Legends | 107.4 | 108.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.7 | 86.4 | | Overwatch | 92.6 | 93.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.9 | 79.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.2 | 57.6 | | Warzone | 89.2 | 89.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.0 | 96.8 | | Valheim | 94.9 | 95.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13400F | 94% |
Core i9-10900KF | 39% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13400F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900KF as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 234 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2875 | 2677 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 465 | 539 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6385 | 6399 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1622 | 1418 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18356 | 17325 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1483 | 3105 | | Multi-Core | 31282 | 23797 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1837 | 1471 | | Multi-Core | 12341 | 13125 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13400F |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 10 | | Threads | 16 | 20 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 20 MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | Yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900KF is 10% better than Core i5-13400F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13400F is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900KF is better: 19
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13400F and Intel Core i9-10900KF before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-13400F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-10900KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
