 |
Intel Core i5-13600HX vs Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 14-11-2022
If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13600HX vs Intel Core i9-10900KF and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, RealBench, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Handbrake, 7zip, Gears 5, Furmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, Blender, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Prime95, Blender, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900KF or Intel Core i5-13600HX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13600HX | 59% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600HX is 3% better than Core i9-10900KF. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13600HX | 57% |
Core i9-10900KF | 57% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Control, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.8 | 101.4 | | Valorant | 115.6 | 115.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.8 | 64.5 | | Apex Legends | 108.7 | 108.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.7 | 86.4 | | Overwatch | 93.7 | 93.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.8 | 79.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.8 | 57.6 | | Warzone | 90.2 | 89.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 97.1 | 96.8 | | Valheim | 96.0 | 95.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13600HX | 152% |
Core i9-10900KF | 39% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600HX is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900KF since it has less power consumption: 40W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 234 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2765 | 2677 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 457 | 539 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6127 | 6399 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1566 | 1418 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17589 | 17325 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1432 | 3105 | | Multi-Core | 29964 | 23797 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Single-Core | 1835 | 1471 | | Multi-Core | 13490 | 13125 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900KF | | Announcement date | November 12, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 14 | 10 | | Threads | 20 | 20 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 125 W | | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 6 MB | | | L3 cache | 44 MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900KF is 35% better than Core i5-13600HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13600HX has 4 more core than Core i9-10900KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600HX is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900KF is better: 7
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600HX and Intel Core i9-10900KF before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600HX Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i9-10900KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
