Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Core i3-9320 vs Intel Core i7-6700 gaming benchmark

Intel Core i3-9320 vs Intel Core i7-6700

Processor comparisons   18-01-2022
   For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-9320 vs Intel Core i7-6700 and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, WPrime, Blender, SuperPi, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, Geekbench 5.2, PCMark 10, MATLAB, Furmark, RealBench, AIDA64, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, Prime95.
   And how good the CPUs are in games:
  • Fallout 76
  • Valorant
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Valheim
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Overwatch
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Last Man Standing
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Apex Legends
  • Fortnite
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Halo Infinite
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Death Stranding
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Borderlands 3

   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700 or Intel Core i3-9320.

 
Intel Core i3-9320
Intel Core i7-6700

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

Processor Benchmark
Core i3-932054% Core i7-670054%


Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
Core i3-932053% Core i7-670053%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite94.594.7
Valorant107.4107.6
Cyberpunk 207760.260.3
Apex Legends101.0101.2
Call of Duty Warzone80.680.7
Overwatch87.087.2
Red Dead Redemption 274.174.3
DOOM Eternal53.753.8
Warzone83.884.0
Assassin's Creed90.290.4
Valheim89.289.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
Core i3-932064% Core i7-670056%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-9320 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6700 since it has less power consumption: 62W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.


Software benchmarks

Let's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
Intel Core i3-9320 Intel Core i7-6700
Cinbench 15 Single-core182171
Cinbench 15 Multi-core715816
Cinbench 20 Single-core482406
Cinbench 20 Multi-core17661774
Cinbench 23 Single-core9501071
Cinbench 23 Multi-core36884921

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-9320 Intel Core i7-6700
Single-Core27382325
Multi-Core73808025

GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Intel Core i3-9320 Intel Core i7-6700
Single-Core12061095
Multi-Core42364353

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!

Intel Core i3-9320 Intel Core i7-6700
Announcement dateJuly 07, 2019April 01, 2015
TypeDesktopDesktop
SocketFCLGA1151LGA 1151
Core nameCoffee LakeSkylake
Architecturex86x86
Generation96
Turbo Frequency4.4 MHz4 MHz
Frequency3.7 MHz3.4 MHz
Cores44
Threads48
Bus rate8 GT/s8 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm14 nm
Transistors count2400 millions2800 millions
Power consumption (TDP)62 W65 W
Memory typeDDR4-2400DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V
Max. Memory64 Gb64 Gb
Memory Frequency
Memory bandwidth37.5 GB/s34.1 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
OverclockingNoYes
Supports ECCYesNo
Part numberExpansion Options
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-9320 is 8% better than Core i7-6700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9320 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700 is better: 20
   Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-9320 and Intel Core i7-6700 before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score


Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Core i5-9500T Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-8500T

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score
• Fortnite gaming benchmark
• Overwatch gaming benchmark
• PUBG gaming benchmark
• Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark
• DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark
• GTA 5 gaming benchmark
• Roblox gaming benchmark
• Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark
• Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark
• Apex Legends gaming benchmark
• Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark
• Valorant gaming benchmark


Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen 5 3600XT Vs Core i7-6700
• Core i7-10875H Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Core i7-9700K Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Ryzen 7 4700U Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Core i7-9700 Vs Core i7-6700
• Ryzen 5 3500X Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU SoCs li..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU Devices..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU Benchma..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU PUBG mo..
Mali-G610 MC3 (600 MHz) GPU Fortnit..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G6..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G5..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G6..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Adreno ..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Mali-G7..
Mali-G610 MC3(600MHz) vs Apple A..