|
Intel Core i3-1125G4 vs Intel Core i7-6700 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i3-1125G4 vs Intel Core i7-6700 and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as AIDA64, Gears 5, 3DMark, Blender, PassMark, UserBenchmark, WPrime, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, SuperPi, Handbrake, Blender, Prime95, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). Gaming performance of processors in: - Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700 or Intel Core i3-1125G4.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1125G4 | 52% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1125G4 | 52% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.6 | 92.4 | Valorant | 105.2 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.9 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 98.9 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.9 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 85.2 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.6 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 52.6 | 52.5 | Warzone | 82.1 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 88.4 | 88.2 | Valheim | 87.3 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1125G4 | 196% |
Core i7-6700 | 56% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1125G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6700 since it has less power consumption: 20W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 198 | 171 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 778 | 816 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 406 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1922 | 1774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1034 | 1071 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4014 | 4921 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 3461 | 2325 | Multi-Core | 8031 | 8025 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 1179 | 1095 | Multi-Core | 4510 | 4353 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Announcement date | February 24, 2021 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1449 | LGA 1151 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3200 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 20 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-6700 is 41% better than Core i3-1125G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1125G4 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700 is better: 8 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-1125G4 and Intel Core i7-6700 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1125G4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i5-2500K • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300U • Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
Intel Core i7-6700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
| |
|