|
Intel Core i3-10105T vs Intel Core i7-6700 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-10105T vs Intel Core i7-6700 and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Prime95, Gears 5, WPrime, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, RealBench, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, Blender, PassMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700 or Intel Core i3-10105T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10105T | 52% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10105T | 52% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.9 | 92.4 | Valorant | 104.5 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.5 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 98.2 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.4 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 84.6 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.1 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 52.2 | 52.5 | Warzone | 81.5 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 87.8 | 88.2 | Valheim | 86.7 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10105T | 112% |
Core i7-6700 | 56% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10105T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6700 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10105T |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 189 | 171 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 991 | 816 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 443 | 406 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2261 | 1774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1132 | 1071 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4396 | 4921 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10105T |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 2590 | 2325 | Multi-Core | 8798 | 8025 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10105T |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 1186 | 1095 | Multi-Core | 3862 | 4353 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-10105T |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | LGA 1151 | Core name | Comet Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-6700 is 11% better than Core i3-10105T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10105T is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700 is better: 18 Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-10105T and Intel Core i7-6700 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-10105T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel Core i7-6700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
| |
|