|
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Intel Core i7-6700 |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Intel Core i7-6700 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, WPrime, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700 or AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | 52% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | 51% |
Core i7-6700 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.3 | 92.4 | Valorant | 103.7 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 84.0 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 52.5 | Warzone | 80.9 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 87.1 | 88.2 | Valheim | 86.1 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G | 42% |
Core i7-6700 | 56% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-6700 is more energy efficient than the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 171 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 736 | 816 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 351 | 406 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1603 | 1774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 906 | 1071 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4356 | 4921 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 2344 | 2325 | Multi-Core | 7678 | 8025 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Single-Core | 823 | 1095 | Multi-Core | 3218 | 4353 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G |
Intel Core i7-6700 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | LGA 1151 | Core name | Dali | Skylake | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2400 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YD315BC5M4MFH
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is 2% better than Core i7-6700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700 is better: 29 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G and Intel Core i7-6700 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150G Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-6700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
| |
|