 |
Intel Core i5-4690K vs Intel Core i3-8300 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-4690K vs Intel Core i3-8300 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Blender, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, SuperPi, Blender, UserBenchmark, PassMark, RealBench, WPrime, 3DMark, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Gears 5, AIDA64, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-8300 or Intel Core i5-4690K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-4690K | 51% |
Core i3-8300 | 51% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-4690K | 52% |
Core i3-8300 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.2 | 91.8 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 104.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 58.4 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 98.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 78.3 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 84.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 72.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.2 | | Warzone | 81.7 | 81.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 87.7 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 86.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-4690K | 44% |
Core i3-8300 | 60% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-8300 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-4690K since it has less power consumption: 88W vs. 62W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 158 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 534 | 633 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 351 | 409 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1287 | 1499 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 834 | 807 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2900 | 3131 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 2211 | 2288 | | Multi-Core | 5590 | 6264 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 1163 | 1119 | | Multi-Core | 4082 | 3754 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-4690K |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Announcement date | June 24, 2014 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1150 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Devil's Canyon | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 88 W | 62 W | | Memory type | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | Yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8300 is 5% better than Core i5-4690K in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-4690K is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8300 is better: 18
All the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-4690K and Intel Core i3-8300 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
Intel Core i3-8300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-7500
|
|
|
