 |
Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i3-8300 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i3-8300 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark 10, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, AIDA64, SuperPi, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Prime95, VeraCrypt, Furmark, MATLAB, RealBench, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender.
And how good the processors are in games: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-8300 or Intel Core i3-13300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300 | 59% |
Core i3-8300 | 51% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300 is 13% better than Core i3-8300. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300 | 54% |
Core i3-8300 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 91.8 | | Valorant | 109.4 | 104.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 58.4 | | Apex Legends | 102.8 | 98.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.0 | 78.3 | | Overwatch | 88.6 | 84.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 72.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 52.2 | | Warzone | 85.3 | 81.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.9 | 87.7 | | Valheim | 90.8 | 86.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300 | 95% |
Core i3-8300 | 60% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8300 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 62W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 296 | 158 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2849 | 633 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 477 | 409 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6299 | 1499 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1615 | 807 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18070 | 3131 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 1479 | 2288 | | Multi-Core | 30781 | 6264 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 1858 | 1119 | | Multi-Core | 8100 | 3754 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 4 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 62 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8300 is 18% better than Core i3-13300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300 has 4 more core than Core i3-8300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8300 is better: 6
Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300 and Intel Core i3-8300 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i3-8300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Core i5-7500
|
|
|
