|
Intel Core i3-8300 vs Intel Core i7-3770K |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-8300 vs Intel Core i7-3770K and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark 10, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, AIDA64, PassMark, MATLAB, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 3DMark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Prime95, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-3770K or Intel Core i3-8300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-8300 | 51% |
Core i7-3770K | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-8300 | 52% |
Core i7-3770K | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.8 | 92.1 | Valorant | 104.4 | 104.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.4 | 58.6 | Apex Legends | 98.1 | 98.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.3 | 78.5 | Overwatch | 84.5 | 84.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.0 | 72.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.2 | 52.4 | Warzone | 81.4 | 81.7 | Assassin's Creed | 87.7 | 88.0 | Valheim | 86.6 | 86.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-8300 | 60% |
Core i7-3770K | 42% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-8300 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-3770K as it consumes less power: 62W vs. 77W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-8300 |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 158 | 137 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 633 | 672 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 409 | 286 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1499 | 1391 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 807 | 1016 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3131 | 3503 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8300 |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Single-Core | 2288 | 2049 | Multi-Core | 6264 | 6445 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8300 |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Single-Core | 1119 | 979 | Multi-Core | 3754 | 4061 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-8300 |
Intel Core i7-3770K | Announcement date | July 07, 2018 | April 01, 2012 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | LGA1155 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Ivy Bridge | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 4800 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 62 W | 77 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR3 1333/1600 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8300 is 5% better than Core i7-3770K in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8300 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3770K is better: 19 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-8300 and Intel Core i7-3770K before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-8300 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Core i5-7500
Intel Core i7-3770K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|