 |
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-8300 |
|
Processor comparisons 22-11-2022
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i3-8300 and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as AIDA64, 7zip, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, Furmark, RealBench, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, WPrime, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-8300 or AMD Ryzen 3 2200G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% |
Core i3-8300 | 51% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 3 2200G is 1% better than Core i3-8300. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 3 2200G | 52% |
Core i3-8300 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.5 | 91.8 | | Valorant | 104.0 | 104.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.3 | 58.4 | | Apex Legends | 97.8 | 98.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.0 | 78.3 | | Overwatch | 84.3 | 84.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.8 | 72.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.0 | 52.2 | | Warzone | 81.1 | 81.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.4 | 87.7 | | Valheim | 86.3 | 86.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 3 2200G | 53% |
Core i3-8300 | 60% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-8300 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 3 2200G since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 62W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 142 | 158 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 576 | 633 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 308 | 409 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1307 | 1499 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 942 | 807 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3587 | 3131 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 2075 | 2288 | | Multi-Core | 6736 | 6264 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Single-Core | 1035 | 1119 | | Multi-Core | 3473 | 3754 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
Intel Core i3-8300 | | Announcement date | February 12, 2018 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raven Ridge | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen | x86 | | Generation | 1 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 62 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | 384KB | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 4MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | Yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | YD2200C5M4MFB | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8300 is 5% better than Ryzen 3 2200G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8300 is better: 28
Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Core i3-8300 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1500X
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
Intel Core i3-8300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Core i5-7500
|
|
|
