|
Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i9-10910 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i9-10910 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Blender, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, 3DMark, RealBench, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, PassMark, Gears 5, 7zip, MATLAB, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10. And how good the processors are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10910 or Intel Core i3-13300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13300 | 59% |
Core i9-10910 | 56% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300 is 5% better than Core i9-10910. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13300 | 54% |
Core i9-10910 | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.3 | 98.4 | Valorant | 109.4 | 111.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 102.8 | 105.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.0 | 83.8 | Overwatch | 88.6 | 90.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 77.1 | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 55.9 | Warzone | 85.3 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 91.9 | 93.9 | Valheim | 90.8 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13300 | 95% |
Core i9-10910 | 34% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300 is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10910 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 296 | 193 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2849 | 2303 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 477 | 511 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6299 | 6021 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1615 | 1116 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18070 | 13966 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Single-Core | 1479 | 3073 | Multi-Core | 30781 | 22253 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Single-Core | 1858 | 1279 | Multi-Core | 8100 | 10152 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i9-10910 | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 8 | 10 | Threads | 12 | 20 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10910 is 16% better than Core i3-13300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10910 has 2 more core than Core i3-13300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10910 is better: 21 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13300 and Intel Core i9-10910 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-10910 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
| |
|