 |
Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i3-10300 |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i3-10300 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as AIDA64, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, PassMark, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Furmark, 7zip, SuperPi, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 3DMark, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10300 or Intel Core i3-13300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300 | 59% |
Core i3-10300 | 52% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300 is 11% better than Core i3-10300. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300 | 54% |
Core i3-10300 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Control, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 93.0 | | Valorant | 109.4 | 105.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 59.2 | | Apex Legends | 102.8 | 99.4 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.0 | 79.3 | | Overwatch | 88.6 | 85.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 72.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 52.9 | | Warzone | 85.3 | 82.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.9 | 88.8 | | Valheim | 90.8 | 87.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300 | 95% |
Core i3-10300 | 63% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10300 as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-10300 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 296 | 199 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2849 | 1037 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 477 | 462 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6299 | 2353 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1615 | 1208 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18070 | 4690 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-10300 | | Single-Core | 1479 | 2685 | | Multi-Core | 30781 | 9387 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-10300 | | Single-Core | 1858 | 1238 | | Multi-Core | 8100 | 4924 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-10300 | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 8 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2460 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10300 is 18% better than Core i3-13300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300 has 4 more core than Core i3-10300. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10300 is better: 5
However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13300 and Intel Core i3-10300 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i3-10300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-4690K
|
|
|
