 |
Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i3-8300T |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-13300 vs Intel Core i3-8300T tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Prime95, Blender, MATLAB, RealBench, Gears 5, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, Furmark, PassMark, Blender, WPrime, UserBenchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-8300T or Intel Core i3-13300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13300 | 59% |
Core i3-8300T | 51% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13300 is 13% better than Core i3-8300T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13300 | 54% |
Core i3-8300T | 52% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.3 | 91.5 | | Valorant | 109.4 | 104.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.3 | 58.2 | | Apex Legends | 102.8 | 97.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.0 | 78.0 | | Overwatch | 88.6 | 84.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.5 | 71.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.7 | 52.0 | | Warzone | 85.3 | 81.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.9 | 87.4 | | Valheim | 90.8 | 86.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13300 | 95% |
Core i3-8300T | 83% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13300 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8300T since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 296 | 137 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2849 | 547 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 477 | 380 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6299 | 1390 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1615 | 748 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18070 | 2904 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300T | | Single-Core | 1479 | 1984 | | Multi-Core | 30781 | 5809 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300T | | Single-Core | 1858 | 877 | | Multi-Core | 8100 | 3454 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13300 |
Intel Core i3-8300T | | Announcement date | January 19, 2023 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | | | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 4 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2460 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8300T is 6% better than Core i3-13300 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-13300 has 4 more core than Core i3-8300T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13300 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8300T is better: 6
Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13300 and Intel Core i3-8300T before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13300 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i3-8300T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-4690K
|
|
|
