 |
Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i7-1180G7 |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i7-1180G7 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like WPrime, Handbrake, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, 7zip, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, SuperPi, AIDA64, Prime95, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, RealBench, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-1180G7 or Intel Core i3-1305U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-1305U | 57% |
Core i7-1180G7 | 53% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1305U is 7% better than Core i7-1180G7. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-1305U | 54% |
Core i7-1180G7 | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 93.4 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 106.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 59.5 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 99.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 79.6 | | Overwatch | 87.5 | 86.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 73.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 53.1 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 82.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 89.2 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 88.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-1305U | 369% |
Core i7-1180G7 | 509% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1180G7 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-1305U since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 10W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-1180G7 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 224 | 172 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2295 | 1028 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 556 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5093 | 2304 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1295 | 1430 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14639 | 5826 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-1180G7 | | Single-Core | 1182 | 2828 | | Multi-Core | 24951 | 10691 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-1180G7 | | Single-Core | 1663 | 1527 | | Multi-Core | 6952 | 5333 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i7-1180G7 | | Announcement date | January 15, 2023 | February 22, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | BGA1526 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.2 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 4 | | Threads | 6 | 8 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 2 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 10 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1305U is 33% better than Core i7-1180G7 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-1305U has 1 more core than Core i7-1180G7. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1305U is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1180G7 is better: 8
However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1305U and Intel Core i7-1180G7 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-1305U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-1180G7 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i3-N300
|
|
|
