|
Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i9-10980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i9-10980HK and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Blender, Furmark, RealBench, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Handbrake, PassMark, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB. Gaming performance of processors in: - Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10980HK or Intel Core i3-1305U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1305U | 57% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1305U is 3% better than Core i9-10980HK. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1305U | 54% |
Core i9-10980HK | 55% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Control, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.1 | 97.2 | Valorant | 108.1 | 110.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.9 | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 103.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 82.9 | Overwatch | 87.5 | 89.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 76.2 | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 55.2 | Warzone | 84.3 | 86.2 | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 92.8 | Valheim | 89.7 | 91.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1305U | 369% |
Core i9-10980HK | 106% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1305U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10980HK since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 224 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2295 | 1627 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 507 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5093 | 3643 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1295 | 1136 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14639 | 11013 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Single-Core | 1182 | 2913 | Multi-Core | 24951 | 16588 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Single-Core | 1663 | 1437 | Multi-Core | 6952 | 9056 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i9-10980HK | Announcement date | January 15, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 5 | 8 | Threads | 6 | 16 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 2100 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1305U is 27% better than Core i9-10980HK in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10980HK has 3 more core than Core i3-1305U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1305U is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10980HK is better: 20 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-1305U and Intel Core i9-10980HK before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1305U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10980HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|