|
Intel Core i3-1305U vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-1305U vs AMD Athlon PRO 300U tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, 3DMark, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, Gears 5, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, AIDA64, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Prime95, RealBench, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). And how good the processors are in games: - Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon PRO 300U or Intel Core i3-1305U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1305U | 57% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1305U is 10% better than Athlon PRO 300U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1305U | 54% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Control, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.1 | 90.0 | Valorant | 108.1 | 102.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 57.3 | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 96.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 76.7 | Overwatch | 87.5 | 82.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 70.6 | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 51.1 | Warzone | 84.3 | 79.8 | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 85.9 | Valheim | 89.7 | 84.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1305U | 369% |
Athlon PRO 300U | 165% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1305U is more energy efficient than the Athlon PRO 300U since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 224 | 140 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2295 | 392 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 330 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5093 | 826 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1295 | 523 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14639 | 2520 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 1182 | 1870 | Multi-Core | 24951 | 4441 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Single-Core | 1663 | 746 | Multi-Core | 6952 | 1978 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Athlon PRO 300U | Announcement date | January 15, 2023 | October 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP5 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raven Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 5 | 2 | Threads | 6 | 4 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 1600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 384KB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1MB | L3 cache | 10 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM300BC4T2OFG n/a
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1305U is 27% better than Athlon PRO 300U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i3-1305U has 3 more core than Athlon PRO 300U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1305U is better: 33
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 300U is better: 3 Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1305U and AMD Athlon PRO 300U before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1305U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Athlon PRO 300U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
| |
|