 |
Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i5-11500H |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-1305U vs Intel Core i5-11500H tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as SuperPi, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, PassMark, Prime95, Furmark, WPrime, AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11500H or Intel Core i3-1305U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-1305U | 57% |
Core i5-11500H | 56% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1305U is 1% better than Core i5-11500H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-1305U | 54% |
Core i5-11500H | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 96.6 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 109.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.4 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 103.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 82.3 | | Overwatch | 87.5 | 88.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 75.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 54.9 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 85.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 92.2 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 91.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-1305U | 369% |
Core i5-11500H | 137% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1305U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11500H as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i5-11500H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 224 | 198 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2295 | 1896 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 463 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5093 | 4248 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1295 | 1208 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14639 | 11244 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i5-11500H | | Single-Core | 1182 | 2692 | | Multi-Core | 24951 | 20515 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i5-11500H | | Single-Core | 1663 | 1854 | | Multi-Core | 6952 | 8393 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1305U |
Intel Core i5-11500H | | Announcement date | January 15, 2023 | June 20, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1787 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.6 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 6 | | Threads | 6 | 12 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 5600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | Up to 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-1305U is 12% better than Core i5-11500H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-11500H has 1 more core than Core i3-1305U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1305U is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11500H is better: 21
However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1305U and Intel Core i5-11500H before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1305U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-11500H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
|
|
|
