 |
Intel Core i3-1305U vs AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-1305U vs AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as UserBenchmark, Gears 5, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Furmark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Blender, Handbrake, WPrime, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Prime95, AIDA64, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS or Intel Core i3-1305U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-1305U | 57% |
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 58% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 6980HS is 1% better than Core i3-1305U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-1305U | 54% |
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 97.3 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 110.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.9 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 103.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.0 | 82.9 | | Overwatch | 87.5 | 89.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 76.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 55.3 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 86.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 92.9 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 91.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-1305U | 369% |
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 156% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1305U is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 6980HS as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 224 | 261 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2295 | 2536 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 610 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5093 | 5559 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1295 | 1578 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14639 | 14146 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Single-Core | 1182 | 3379 | | Multi-Core | 24951 | 27970 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Single-Core | 1663 | 1643 | | Multi-Core | 6952 | 9105 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1305U |
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS | | Announcement date | January 15, 2023 | January 09, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rembrandt | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 13 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 8 | | Threads | 6 | 16 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 512KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | | L3 cache | 10 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| FP7:100-000000750 FP7r2:100-000000751
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 6980HS has 3 more core than Core i3-1305U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1305U is better: 10
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS is better: 26
However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-1305U and AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1305U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
|
|
|
