Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Google Tensor G3 benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Google Tensor G3

Comparisons   14-10-2023
   Comprehensive compare data of HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Google Tensor G3, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S or Tensor G3.


 
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
Google Tensor G3

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S53% Tensor G376%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S85% Tensor G386%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S52% Tensor G373%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S Tensor G3
Total score7382441071317
CPU206711299978
GPU280524407100
MEM118115171402
UX132893192844

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S Tensor G3
Single-Core10581403
Multi-Core40403849

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S Tensor G3
Frequency2620 MHz3000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm4 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x2.62 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3
4x2.34 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)6 W10 W
Memory typeLPDDR5, LPDDR4xLPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency16003200
Memory bandwidth4451.2
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache1 MB
L2 cache2 MB
L3 cache8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tensor G3 is 12% better than HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMaleoon 910Mali-G715 MP9
GPU Frequency750 MHz750 MHz
GFloPS20561354.62
# of Cores49
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1600 pixels4096 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile29.540.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)87.4126.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra51.476.2
Call of Duty: Mobile49.969.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)75.8109.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition107.5156.3
Real Racing 3105.6152.6
Sniper 3D115.4166.8
Need for Speed No Limits73.2106.8
Mortal Kombat X77.3109.7
CSR Racing 264.691.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution128 MP360 MP
Dual Camera resolution48 MP64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP
Video Encoding FPS6060
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCDolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, AV1 BigWave


Networks and Navigation
ModemBalong 5GExynos Modem 5223
Download speed15000 MBit/s.10150 MBit/s.
Upload speed14000 MBit/s.9500 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouDual frequency GNSS, GPS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GLONASS, GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G3 is better: 30
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Tensor G3 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


Tensor G3 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands