|
MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) vs MediaTek Helio P22 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) vs MediaTek Helio P22, comparison of GPUs PowerVR GE8320 and Mali-T880 MP2. This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Helio P22 is octa-core (Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) or Helio P22 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | 4% |
Helio P22 | 5% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | 50% |
Helio P22 | 62% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) | 3% |
Helio P22 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) |
Helio P22 | Total score | 59865 | 77006 | CPU | 16766 | 21567 | GPU | 22743 | 29256 | MEM | 9582 | 12326 | UX | 10779 | 13860 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) |
Helio P22 | Single-Core | 154 | 199 | Multi-Core | 697 | 896 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) |
Helio P22 | Frequency | 2390 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 16 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.39 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | LPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | Memory bandwidth | 14 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 1 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) is 16% better than Helio P22 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T880 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 | GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 68 | 126.8 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 11.4 | 16.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 20.9 | 28.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 12.1 | 17.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 8.4 | 13.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 12.3 | 16.4 | Real Racing 3 | 31.4 | 56.2 | Sniper 3D | 46 | 45 | Need for Speed No Limits | 33.4 | 50.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 24 | 32.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 27.2 | 33.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 24 MP | 21 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P22 is better: 18 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) and Helio P22, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) SoC Comparisons • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36
Helio P22 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
| |
|