MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T618

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T618, compare of GPUs Mali-G57 MC2 and Mali-G52 MP2.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Dimensity 700 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Tiger T618 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy Dimensity 700 or Tiger T618 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 700

20%

Tiger T618

15%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 700

76%

Tiger T618

66%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 700

19%

Tiger T618

12%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 700	Tiger T618
Total score	285883	211843
CPU	80048	59325
GPU	108632	80491
MEM	45749	33895
UX	51452	38140

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 700	Tiger T618
Single-Core	640	436
Multi-Core	2177	1747

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 700	Tiger T618
Frequency	2200 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	12 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1066
Memory bandwidth	17.07	13
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		16 KB
L2 cache		256 KB
L3 cache		4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 700 is 9% better than Tiger T618 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	486	418.78
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.8	25.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	46.4	28.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	45.5	50.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	38.9	31.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	36.1	25.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	59.9	37.2
Real Racing 3	56.9	63.4
Sniper 3D	100.1	81.1
Need for Speed No Limits	63.7	60.8
Mortal Kombat X	72.8	73.5
CSR Racing 2	50.1	60.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS	240	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	LTE-7
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	500 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 700 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T618 is better: 9
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Dimensity 700 and Tiger T618, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 700 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 700 specs and review.

Tiger T618 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T618 specs and review.