|
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Unisoc Tiger T618 |
|
Comparisons 24-08-2021 Full testing data of MediaTek Helio G88 vs Unisoc Tiger T618, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Helio G88 or Tiger T618.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio G88 | 18% |
Tiger T618 | 15% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio G88 | 68% |
Tiger T618 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio G88 | 17% |
Tiger T618 | 12% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio G88 |
Tiger T618 | Total score | 262278 | 211843 | CPU | 73434 | 59325 | GPU | 99674 | 80491 | MEM | 41969 | 33895 | UX | 47214 | 38140 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio G88 |
Tiger T618 | Single-Core | 577 | 436 | Multi-Core | 2077 | 1747 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio G88 |
Tiger T618 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.00 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1800 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | | 13 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 16 KB | L2 cache | | 256 KB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | Mali-G52 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 468.05 | 418.78 | # of Cores | 2 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.6 | 25.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 46.2 | 28.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 41.1 | 50.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 36.6 | 31.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 43.9 | 25.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 60.4 | 37.2 | Real Racing 3 | 62.7 | 63.4 | Sniper 3D | 79.9 | 81.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 66.1 | 60.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 60.5 | 73.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 45.9 | 60.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | LTE-7 | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G88 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T618 is better: 10 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio G88 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Tiger T618 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|