Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Unisoc Tiger T618 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Unisoc Tiger T618

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Unisoc Tiger T618, comparison of GPUs Mali-G52 MP2 and Adreno 612.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 678 is octa-core (Kryo 460) and Tiger T618 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Quadrant, 3DMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, PUBG etc.

   After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 678 or Tiger T618 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
Unisoc Tiger T618

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 67815% Tiger T61815%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 67864% Tiger T61866%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 67812% Tiger T61812%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 678 Tiger T618
Total score216174211843
CPU6053359325
GPU8214880491
MEM3458933895
UX3891138140

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 678 Tiger T618
Single-Core348436
Multi-Core12071747

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 678 Tiger T618
Frequency2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography11 nm12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration8x2.0 GHz Kryo 4602x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)6 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)LPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency18661066
Memory bandwidth14.913
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache16 KB16 KB
L2 cache256 KB256 KB
L3 cache4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 612Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Frequency700 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS398418.78
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units256
Display1080 x 2520 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile20.425.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)41.228.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra46.650.7
Call of Duty: Mobile36.831.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)35.725.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition50.837.2
Real Racing 381.663.4
Sniper 3D60.681.1
Need for Speed No Limits83.960.8
Mortal Kombat X74.673.5
CSR Racing 265.260.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution25 MP48 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 160Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE modemLTE-7
Download speed600 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo, GLONASS, SBAS, GPS, Beidou, QZSSGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T618 is better: 13
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Snapdragon 678 and Tiger T618, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 678 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Tiger T618 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon 678 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9810
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
• Vs Samsung Exynos 880
• Vs MediaTek Helio G70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
• Vs MediaTek Helio P95
• Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P90
• Vs MediaTek Helio P60
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9610
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9611
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
• Vs MediaTek Helio P70
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9609
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2


Tiger T618 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands