 |
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i9-11980HK |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 3750H vs Intel Core i9-11980HK tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Prime95, WPrime, PCMark 10, PassMark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Blender, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-11980HK or AMD Ryzen 7 3750H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 7 3750H | 52% |
Core i9-11980HK | 58% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-11980HK is 10% better than Ryzen 7 3750H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 7 3750H | 52% |
Core i9-11980HK | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.6 | 98.4 | Valorant | 104.1 | 111.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.3 | 62.6 | Apex Legends | 97.9 | 105.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.1 | 83.9 | Overwatch | 84.4 | 90.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.9 | 77.2 | DOOM Eternal | 52.1 | 55.9 | Warzone | 81.2 | 87.2 | Assassin's Creed | 87.5 | 93.9 | Valheim | 86.4 | 92.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 7 3750H | 80% |
Core i9-11980HK | 82% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-11980HK is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 3750H since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3750H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 146 | 298 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 789 | 2704 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 367 | 668 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1809 | 6009 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 726 | 1735 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4215 | 17294 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3750H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 2109 | 3989 | Multi-Core | 8435 | 29565 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3750H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Single-Core | 849 | 1599 | Multi-Core | 3578 | 10219 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 7 3750H |
Intel Core i9-11980HK | Announcement date | February 14, 2019 | February 21, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1787 | Core name | Picasso | Tiger Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 3 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Threads | 8 | 16 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | | Up to 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 4 MB | L3 cache | | 24 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM3700C4T4MFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-11980HK is 30% better than Ryzen 7 3750H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-11980HK has 4 more core than Ryzen 7 3750H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is better: 1
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-11980HK is better: 35 The summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 3750H and Intel Core i9-11980HK before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
Intel Core i9-11980HK Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
| |
|