 |
AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 9254 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7262 vs AMD EPYC 9254 and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Prime95, Blender, SuperPi, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, 7zip, 3DMark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Furmark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt.
And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Valorant
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9254 or AMD EPYC 7262.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7262 | 56% |
EPYC 9254 | 66% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9254 is 15% better than EPYC 7262. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7262 | 57% |
EPYC 9254 | 70% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.4 | 124.2 | | Valorant | 115.2 | 141.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.5 | 79.1 | | Apex Legends | 108.3 | 132.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.4 | 105.9 | | Overwatch | 93.3 | 114.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.5 | 97.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.6 | 70.6 | | Warzone | 89.9 | 110.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.8 | 118.6 | | Valheim | 95.6 | 117.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7262 | 22% |
EPYC 9254 | 29% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9254 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7262 as it consumes less power: 155W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 199 | 129 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1922 | 6801 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 398 | 274 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4212 | 14453 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1148 | 730 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11721 | 37643 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Single-Core | 1915 | 1687 | | Multi-Core | 21190 | 55233 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Single-Core | 1037 | 1797 | | Multi-Core | 13124 | 35518 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7262 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4.15 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 24 | | Threads | 16 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000041
100-100000041WOF | 100-000000480
100-000000480WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7262 is 9% better than EPYC 9254 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9254 has 16 more core than EPYC 7262. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7262 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9254 is better: 28
Although it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7262 and AMD EPYC 9254 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7262 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9254 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
