 |
AMD EPYC 9454 vs AMD EPYC 9254 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9454 vs AMD EPYC 9254 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like RealBench, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, 3DMark, AIDA64, Blender, PCMark 10, 7zip, MATLAB, Gears 5, SuperPi, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9254 or AMD EPYC 9454.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9454 | 74% |
EPYC 9254 | 66% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454 is 10% better than EPYC 9254. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9454 | 81% |
EPYC 9254 | 70% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 143.4 | 124.2 | | Valorant | 163.0 | 141.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 91.3 | 79.1 | | Apex Legends | 153.2 | 132.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 122.2 | 105.9 | | Overwatch | 132.0 | 114.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 112.5 | 97.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 81.5 | 70.6 | | Warzone | 127.1 | 110.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 136.9 | 118.6 | | Valheim | 135.3 | 117.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9454 | 18% |
EPYC 9254 | 29% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9254 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9454 since it has less power consumption: 290W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 215 | 129 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9941 | 6801 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 428 | 274 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 21096 | 14453 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1093 | 730 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 54903 | 37643 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Single-Core | 2487 | 1687 | | Multi-Core | 80546 | 55233 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Single-Core | 1569 | 1797 | | Multi-Core | 54343 | 35518 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9454 |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.15 MHz | | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 24 | | Threads | 96 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000478
100-100000478WOF | 100-000000480
100-000000480WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9254 is 5% better than EPYC 9454 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454 has 24 more core than EPYC 9254. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9254 is better: 4
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9454 and AMD EPYC 9254 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9454 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9254 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
