 |
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9254 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9254 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Prime95, 3DMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9254 or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 9254 | 66% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9254 is 6% better than EPYC 7373X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 9254 | 70% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 124.2 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 141.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 79.1 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 132.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 105.9 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 114.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 97.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 70.6 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 110.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 118.6 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 117.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 9254 | 29% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9254 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7373X as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 129 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 6801 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 274 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 14453 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 730 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 37643 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Single-Core | 1311 | 1687 | | Multi-Core | 42034 | 55233 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Single-Core | 1476 | 1797 | | Multi-Core | 24660 | 35518 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9254 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Milan | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 4.15 MHz | | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 24 | | Threads | 32 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000508
100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000480
100-000000480WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 4% better than EPYC 9254 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9254 has 8 more core than EPYC 7373X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9254 is better: 33
However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 9254 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9254 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
