Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7532 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7532

Processor comparisons   19-03-2023
   For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 7532 and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, RealBench, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, 3DMark, Blender, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, WPrime, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Furmark, Gears 5, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, Handbrake.
   Gaming performance of CPUs in:
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Valheim
  • Fallout 76
  • Halo Infinite
  • Overwatch
  • Death Stranding
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Apex Legends
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Fortnite
  • Borderlands 3
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valorant
  • Last Man Standing
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Rainbow Six Siege

   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7532 or AMD EPYC 7642.


 
AMD EPYC 7642
AMD EPYC 7532

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 764268% EPYC 753267%
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7642 is 1% better than EPYC 7532. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 764273% EPYC 753275%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite129.7133.3
Valorant147.3151.5
Cyberpunk 207782.584.9
Apex Legends138.5142.4
Call of Duty Warzone110.5113.6
Overwatch119.3122.7
Red Dead Redemption 2101.7104.6
DOOM Eternal73.775.8
Warzone114.9118.2
Assassin's Creed123.8127.3
Valheim122.3125.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 764213% EPYC 753219%
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7532 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7642 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7532
Cinbench 15 Single-core177171
Cinbench 15 Multi-core75946988
Cinbench 20 Single-core443415
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1610414812
Cinbench 23 Single-core844785
Cinbench 23 Multi-core4189038514

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7532
Single-Core24042217
Multi-Core6154656494

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7532
Single-Core9181146
Multi-Core4083644451

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

AMD EPYC 7642 AMD EPYC 7532
Announcement dateOctober 01, 2020October 01, 2020
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP3
Core nameRomeRome
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 2
Generation22
Turbo Frequency3.3 MHz3.3 MHz
Frequency2.3 MHz2.4 MHz
Cores4832
Threads9664
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count64000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)225 W200 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32003200
Memory bandwidth208 GByte/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part number100-000000074
100-100000074WOF
100-000000136
100-000000136WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7532 is 4% better than EPYC 7642 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7642 has 16 more core than EPYC 7532. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7642 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7532 is better: 15
   Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7642 and AMD EPYC 7532 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7642 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7532 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7642 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7532 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands