 |
AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 9454P |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 9454P and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, PCMark 10, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, RealBench, Prime95, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Gears 5, PassMark, Blender.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9454P or AMD EPYC 7642.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7642 | 68% |
EPYC 9454P | 73% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 6% better than EPYC 7642. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7642 | 73% |
EPYC 9454P | 80% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 142.3 | | Valorant | 147.3 | 161.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 90.6 | | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 152.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 121.3 | | Overwatch | 119.3 | 131.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 111.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 80.9 | | Warzone | 114.9 | 126.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 135.9 | | Valheim | 122.3 | 134.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7642 | 13% |
EPYC 9454P | 17% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9454P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7642 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 290W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 177 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7594 | 9744 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 443 | 421 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16104 | 20676 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 844 | 1073 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 41890 | 53807 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Single-Core | 2404 | 2439 | | Multi-Core | 61546 | 78937 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Single-Core | 918 | 1540 | | Multi-Core | 40836 | 53258 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.75 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 48 | | Threads | 96 | 96 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 290 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000074
100-100000074WOF | 100-000000873
100-000000873WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9454P is 16% better than EPYC 7642 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7642 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 29
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7642 and AMD EPYC 9454P before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7642 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
