 |
AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 9634 |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7642 vs AMD EPYC 9634 and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, RealBench, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Furmark, Gears 5, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, PassMark, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9634 or AMD EPYC 7642.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7642 | 68% |
EPYC 9634 | 94% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9634 is 27% better than EPYC 7642. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7642 | 73% |
EPYC 9634 | 94% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Control, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 129.7 | 165.4 | | Valorant | 147.3 | 188.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 105.3 | | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 176.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 141.0 | | Overwatch | 119.3 | 152.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 129.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 94.0 | | Warzone | 114.9 | 146.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 157.9 | | Valheim | 122.3 | 156.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7642 | 13% |
EPYC 9634 | 15% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9634 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7642 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 290W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 177 | 445 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7594 | 17927 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 443 | 827 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16104 | 37987 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 844 | 2016 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 41890 | 98767 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Single-Core | 2404 | 4237 | | Multi-Core | 61546 | 144876 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Single-Core | 918 | 1331 | | Multi-Core | 40836 | 75930 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7642 |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.25 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 84 | | Threads | 96 | 168 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 290 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000074
100-100000074WOF | 100-000000797
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7642 is 2% better than EPYC 9634 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9634 has 36 more core than EPYC 7642. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7642 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9634 is better: 32
Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7642 and AMD EPYC 9634 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7642 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9634 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
