AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 7313

Processor comparisons 19-03-2023

   Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7402 vs AMD EPYC 7313 and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing, programming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, MATLAB, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, Handbrake, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Blender, Gears 5, AIDA64, Prime95, 7zip.
   And how good the CPUs are in games:

Valorant
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Red Dead Redemption 2
Last Man Standing
Watch Dogs Legion
Grand Theft Auto V
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Fallout 76
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Apex Legends
Death Stranding
DOOM: Eternal
Fortnite
Cyberpunk 2077
Rainbow Six Siege
Valheim
Overwatch
Borderlands 3
Halo Infinite

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7313 or AMD EPYC 7402.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 7402

64%

EPYC 7313

62%

This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7402 is 3% better than EPYC 7313. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 7402

67%

EPYC 7313

68%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	118.6	120.0
Valorant	134.7	136.4
Cyberpunk 2077	75.5	76.4
Apex Legends	126.7	128.2
Call of Duty Warzone	101.1	102.3
Overwatch	109.1	110.5
Red Dead Redemption 2	93.0	94.1
DOOM Eternal	67.4	68.2
Warzone	105.1	106.4
Assassin's Creed	113.2	114.6
Valheim	111.8	113.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 7402

20%

EPYC 7313

30%

To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7402 since it has less power consumption: 180W vs. 155W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.

Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 7402	AMD EPYC 7313
Cinbench 15 Single-core	146	124
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	6023	5029
Cinbench 20 Single-core	476	229
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	12766	10661
Cinbench 23 Single-core	674	564
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	33194	27719

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7402	AMD EPYC 7313
Single-Core	2174	1268
Multi-Core	48691	40658

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7402	AMD EPYC 7313
Single-Core	1102	1399
Multi-Core	29978	31411

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 7402	AMD EPYC 7313
Announcement date	October 01, 2019	March 15, 2021
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP3	SP3
Core name	Rome	Milan
Architecture	Zen 2	Zen 3
Generation	2	3
Turbo Frequency	3.35 MHz	3.7 MHz
Frequency	2.8 MHz	3 MHz
Cores	24	16
Threads	48	32
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	56000 millions	54000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	180 W	155 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency	3200	3200
Memory bandwidth	204 GByte/s	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	128MB	128MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	100-000000046 100-100000046WOF	100-000000329 100-100000329WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313 is 6% better than EPYC 7402 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7402 has 8 more core than EPYC 7313. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7402 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313 is better: 19
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7402 and AMD EPYC 7313 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 7402 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7402 specs and review.

AMD EPYC 7313 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7313 specs and review.