|
Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937, speed examination of GPUs Mali-T820 and Adreno 505. This performance comparison involves two processors: SC9832E is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications like PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Octane V2, Vellamo, PassMark, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy SC9832E or Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSC9832E | 2% |
Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | 3% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)SC9832E | 32% |
Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | 28% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSC9832E | 1% |
Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | SC9832E |
Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | Total score | 38067 | 44606 | CPU | 10664 | 12489 | GPU | 14464 | 16947 | MEM | 6088 | 7130 | UX | 6855 | 8020 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | SC9832E |
Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | Single-Core | 101 | 118 | Multi-Core | 465 | 545 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | SC9832E |
Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 | Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1400 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 8x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 6 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that SC9832E has 4 more core than Snapdragon 430 MSM8937. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | Adreno 505 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 48 | # of Cores | 1 | | # of Shader Units | | 48 | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 11.9 | 13.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 30.9 | 36.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 19.8 | 24.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 16.7 | 21.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 25.5 | 30.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 38.4 | 45.4 | Real Racing 3 | 29.7 | 36.2 | Sniper 3D | 37.6 | 31.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 23.8 | 38.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 31.7 | 34.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 21.8 | 33.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 21 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X6 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9832E is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 is better: 26 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips SC9832E and Snapdragon 430 MSM8937, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
SC9832E SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
| |
|