MediaTek MT8735 vs MediaTek MT6737

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT8735 vs MediaTek MT6737, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and Mali-T720 MP2.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT8735 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6737 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like Octane V2, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, and how good the chipsets are in games Real Racing 3, PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MT8735 or MT6737 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT8735

MT6737

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT8735

24%

MT6737

28%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT8735

MT6737

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT8735	MT6737
Total score	26526	29344
CPU	7419	8218
GPU	10085	11149
MEM	4250	4686
UX	4771	5285

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT8735	MT6737
Single-Core	70	77
Multi-Core	324	358

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT8735	MT6737
Frequency	1300 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	533	640
Memory bandwidth	4	4.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T720 MP2	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	500 MHz	550 MHz
GFloPS	17	18.7
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 800 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.4	9.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	19.1	23.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	11.8	15.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	11.3	14.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	15.6	19.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	25.9	30.7
Real Racing 3	20.7	19.9
Sniper 3D	22.4	30.2
Need for Speed No Limits	21.2	19.1
Mortal Kombat X	18.9	25.4
CSR Racing 2	13	19.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	16 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264	MPEG-4

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8735 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737 is better: 20
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs MT8735 and MT6737, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT8735 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT8735 specs and review.

MT6737 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6737 specs and review.