MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) vs MediaTek MT6737

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) vs MediaTek MT6737, compare of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and PowerVR G6200.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio X10 (MT6795) is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6737 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Octane V2, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, PUBG, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Helio X10 (MT6795) or MT6737 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Helio X10 (MT6795)

MT6737

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Helio X10 (MT6795)

20%

MT6737

28%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Helio X10 (MT6795)

MT6737

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Helio X10 (MT6795)	MT6737
Total score	50430	29344
CPU	14114	8218
GPU	19163	11149
MEM	8066	4686
UX	9083	5285

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Helio X10 (MT6795)	MT6737
Single-Core	130	77
Multi-Core	587	358

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Helio X10 (MT6795)	MT6737
Frequency	2000 MHz	1300 MHz
Cores	8	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2, LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	3 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	640
Memory bandwidth	6	4.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X10 (MT6795) is 35% better than MT6737 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Helio X10 (MT6795) has -4 more core than MT6737. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR G6200	Mali-T720 MP2
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	550 MHz
GFloPS	89.6	18.7
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	16.5	9.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	42.5	23.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.1	15.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	25.4	14.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.5	19.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	53.9	30.7
Real Racing 3	35.1	19.9
Sniper 3D	61.8	30.2
Need for Speed No Limits	39.3	19.1
Mortal Kombat X	32.3	25.4
CSR Racing 2	39.3	19.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	HD
Codec support	H.264, H.265	MPEG-4

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) is better: 33
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6737 is better: 0
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Helio X10 (MT6795) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• Helio X10 (MT6795) specs and review.

MT6737 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6737 specs and review.