Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 880 benchmark which processor is better

Exynos 850 vs Exynos 880

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 vs Samsung Exynos 880, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G76 MP5 and Mali-G52 MP6.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 850 is octa-core (Cortex-A55) and Exynos 880 is octa-core (Cortex-A77). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as PCMark, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu 8, Geekbench, Neocore, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 850 or Exynos 880 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 850

Exynos 880

14%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 850

74%

Exynos 880

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 850

Exynos 880

12%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 850	Exynos 880
Total score	119144	198613
CPU	33358	55616
GPU	45266	75467
MEM	19058	31778
UX	21445	35758

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 850	Exynos 880
Single-Core	243	2
Multi-Core	1072	1709

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 850	Exynos 880
Frequency	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	8 nm	8 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55	2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 6x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	8 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1866
Memory bandwidth
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)		ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G52 MP6	Mali-G76 MP5
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	426	217
# of Cores	6	4
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	23.2	29.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	45.4	48.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	48.7	56.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	25.1	38.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	41.2	41.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	59.6	64.5
Real Racing 3	85.2	85.4
Sniper 3D	107.1	91
Need for Speed No Limits	58.4	102.4
Mortal Kombat X	70.6	82.5
CSR Racing 2	58.4	74

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	22 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	120
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE Cat.13 5CA/Cat.15 2CA	5G NR Sub, LTE Cat.16 5CA/Cat.18 2CA
Download speed	400 MBit/s.	3550 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	1380 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 850 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 880 is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Exynos 850 and Exynos 880, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 850 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 850 specs and review.

Exynos 880 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 880 specs and review.