|
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G52 MP6 and Mali-G72 MP12. This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 850 is octa-core (Cortex-A55) and Kirin 970 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software such as Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, 3DMark, and how good the chips are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Exynos 850 or Kirin 970 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 850 | 8% |
Kirin 970 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 850 | 74% |
Kirin 970 | 64% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 850 |
Kirin 970 | Total score | 119144 | 160216 | CPU | 33358 | 44870 | GPU | 45266 | 60875 | MEM | 19058 | 25631 | UX | 21445 | 28844 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 850 |
Kirin 970 | Single-Core | 243 | 328 | Multi-Core | 1072 | 1379 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 850 |
Kirin 970 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 8 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 512 KB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 970 is 16% better than Exynos 850 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 MP6 | Mali-G72 MP12 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 426 | 346 | # of Cores | 6 | 12 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 23.2 | 20.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.4 | 24.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 48.7 | 53.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.1 | 27.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.2 | 21.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 59.6 | 30.3 | Real Racing 3 | 85.2 | 106.8 | Sniper 3D | 107.1 | 85.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 58.4 | 64.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 70.6 | 77.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 58.4 | 64.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 22 MP | 20 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.13 5CA/Cat.15 2CA | 18 | Download speed | 400 MBit/s. | 1200 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 850 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 970 is better: 23 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Kirin 970 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|