 |
Exynos 850 vs Helio X30 (MT6799) |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799), speed examination of GPUs PowerVR 7XTP-MT4 and Mali-G52 MP6. This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 850 is octa-core (Cortex-A55) and Helio X30 (MT6799) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as AnTuTu, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, PassMark, Octane V2, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Exynos 850 or Helio X30 (MT6799) and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 850 | 8% |
Helio X30 (MT6799) | 10% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 850 | 74% |
Helio X30 (MT6799) | 63% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 850 | 5% |
Helio X30 (MT6799) | 7% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 850 |
Helio X30 (MT6799) | Total score | 119144 | 141713 | CPU | 33358 | 39673 | GPU | 45266 | 53858 | MEM | 19058 | 22684 | UX | 21445 | 25508 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 850 |
Helio X30 (MT6799) | Single-Core | 243 | 289 | Multi-Core | 1072 | 1275 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 850 |
Helio X30 (MT6799) | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 10 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 8 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A35 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 32 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X30 (MT6799) is 23% better than Exynos 850 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 850 has 2 more core than Helio X30 (MT6799). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G52 MP6 | PowerVR 7XTP-MT4 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 820 MHz | GFloPS | 426 | 209.1 | # of Cores | 6 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 23.2 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.4 | 27.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 48.7 | 39.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 25.1 | 36.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 41.2 | 26.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 59.6 | 39.2 | Real Racing 3 | 85.2 | 58.8 | Sniper 3D | 107.1 | 51 | Need for Speed No Limits | 58.4 | 47 | Mortal Kombat X | 70.6 | 45.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 58.4 | 43.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 22 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264, H.265 |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE Cat.13 5CA/Cat.15 2CA | | Download speed | 400 MBit/s. | 450 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 850 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) is better: 21 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Exynos 850 and Helio X30 (MT6799), as well as read the test results at the links below.
Exynos 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Snapdragon 662 • Vs Snapdragon 710 • Vs Helio G70 • Vs Exynos 880 • Vs Snapdragon 712 • Vs Snapdragon 730 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
Helio X30 (MT6799) SoC Comparisons • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
| |
|