Comparisons 19-05-2022 Full compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Apple A12X Bionic, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PassMark, and how good the chipsets are in games Fortnite, Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 or A12X Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 98% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 91% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 9000 | 94% |
A12X Bionic | 97% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
A12X Bionic | Total score | 1021474 | 673441 | CPU | 163368 | 188899 | GPU | 139627 | 344837 | MEM | 106600 | 65022 | UX | 93142 | 77176 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
A12X Bionic | Single-Core | 1168 | 1152 | Multi-Core | 4246 | 4435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 |
A12X Bionic | Frequency | 3050 MHz | 2490 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 8400 millions | 10000 millions | Core configuration | 1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 4x2.49GHz Vortex 4x1.6 GHz Tempest | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR4X | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 52 | 42 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 48 KB | L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is 18% better than A12X Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Apple A12X Bionic | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 2500 MHz | GFloPS | 1648 | 1360 | # of Cores | 10 | 7 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 26.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 79.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 99.3 | Real Racing 3 | | 85.6 | Sniper 3D | | 63.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 78.2 | Mortal Kombat X | | 56.2 | CSR Racing 2 | | 63.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 12 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 960 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF | Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic is better: 24 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • 3DMark • Antutu 8 • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Snapdragon 875 Vs A12X Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|