Comparisons 17-05-2022 Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Apple A12X Bionic, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PCMark, Neocore, Geekbench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, PUBG, GTA, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8000 or A12X Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 96% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 88% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 91% |
A12X Bionic | 97% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
A12X Bionic | Total score | 777515 | 673441 | CPU | 163368 | 188899 | GPU | 139627 | 344837 | MEM | 106600 | 65022 | UX | 93142 | 77176 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
A12X Bionic | Single-Core | 1145 | 1152 | Multi-Core | 4015 | 4435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
A12X Bionic | Frequency | 2750 MHz | 2490 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | 10000 millions | Core configuration | 4x2.75 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.49GHz Vortex 4x1.6 GHz Tempest | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 42 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 64 KB | 48 KB | L2 cache | 640 KB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is 9% better than A12X Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Apple A12X Bionic | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 2500 MHz | GFloPS | 912 | 1360 | # of Cores | 6 | 7 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 26.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 79.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 99.3 | Real Racing 3 | | 85.6 | Sniper 3D | | 63.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 78.2 | Mortal Kombat X | | 56.2 | CSR Racing 2 | | 63.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 12 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 960 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC | Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic is better: 25 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • 3DMark • Antutu 8 • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Snapdragon 875 Vs A12X Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|