Comparisons 14-05-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Mediatek Dimensity 900 vs Apple A12X Bionic, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Dimensity 900 or A12X Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 900 | 81% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 900 | 73% |
A12X Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 900 | 74% |
A12X Bionic | 97% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 900 |
A12X Bionic | | Total score | 489934 | 673441 | | CPU | 135989 | 188899 | | GPU | 116434 | 344837 | | MEM | 88895 | 65022 | | UX | 77760 | 77176 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 900 |
A12X Bionic | | Single-Core | 1049 | 1152 | | Multi-Core | 3464 | 4435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 900 |
A12X Bionic | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2490 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | 10000 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.49GHz Vortex
4x1.6 GHz Tempest | | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 42 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | 48 KB | | L2 cache | | 4 MB | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 900 is 4% better than A12X Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G68 MP6 | Apple A12X Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | GFloPS | 684 | 1360 | | # of Cores | 24 | 7 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 79.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.9 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.1 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 99.3 | | Real Racing 3 | | 85.6 | | Sniper 3D | | 63.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 78.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 56.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 63.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | 5G Multi-Mode | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a | Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 900 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic is better: 28
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A12X Bionic
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|
