Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T), speed testing of GPUs Adreno 510 and Mali-T880 MP4.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Helio X25 (MT6797T) is deca-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Neocore, Geekbench, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 or Helio X25 (MT6797T) and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

25%

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

41%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Helio X25 (MT6797T)

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Helio X25 (MT6797T)
Total score	82688	93545
CPU	23162	26196
GPU	31412	35553
MEM	13222	14960
UX	14875	16833

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Helio X25 (MT6797T)
Single-Core	214	242
Multi-Core	963	1089

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Helio X25 (MT6797T)
Frequency	1800 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	10
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	20 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.55 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)		5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR3 (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	800
Memory bandwidth	14.9	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB	32 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio X25 (MT6797T) is 28% better than Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 has 2 more core than Helio X25 (MT6797T). Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 510	Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	176	115.51
# of Cores		4
# of Shader Units	128
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.7	19.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.6	34.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.2	21.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.6	16.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.6	20.3
Real Racing 3	42.9	61.1
Sniper 3D	62.9	66.3
Need for Speed No Limits	40	55.8
Mortal Kombat X	45.8	55.8
CSR Racing 2	34.3	41.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	21 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X8 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 and Helio X25 (MT6797T), as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 specs and review.

Helio X25 (MT6797T) SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Helio X25 (MT6797T) specs and review.