Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T880 MP4 and Adreno 510.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Kirin 955 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, PCMark, Octane V2, Geekbench, Vellamo, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Fortnite, Sniper 3D etc.

After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 or Kirin 955 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Kirin 955

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

25%

Kirin 955

49%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976

Kirin 955

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Kirin 955
Total score	82688	102680
CPU	23162	28750
GPU	31412	39011
MEM	13222	16436
UX	14875	18491

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Kirin 955
Single-Core	214	271
Multi-Core	963	924

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 652 MSM8976	Kirin 955
Frequency	1800 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)		5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	1600
Memory bandwidth	14.9	25.6
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	256 KB
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 955 is 28% better than Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 510	Mali-T880 MP4
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	900 MHz
GFloPS	176	122.31
# of Cores		4
# of Shader Units	128
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	15.7	23.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	28.6	39.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.2	26.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.6	19.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	15.6	25.8
Real Racing 3	42.9	69
Sniper 3D	62.9	51.2
Need for Speed No Limits	40	63
Mortal Kombat X	45.8	63
CSR Racing 2	34.3	47.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	21 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X8 LTE modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	100 MBit/s.	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 is better: 11
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 955 is better: 20
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 and Kirin 955, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 specs and review.

Kirin 955 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 955 specs and review.