HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Samsung Exynos 9609

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Samsung Exynos 9609, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G71 MP8 and Mali-G72 MP3.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 960 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Exynos 9609 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Octane V2, Quadrant, PCMark, Neocore, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, PassMark, AnTuTu, and how good the processors are in games Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 960 or Exynos 9609 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 960

Exynos 9609

10%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 960

50%

Exynos 9609

68%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 960

Exynos 9609

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 960	Exynos 9609
Total score	95769	144347
CPU	26819	40426
GPU	36393	54842
MEM	15324	23097
UX	17247	25980

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 960	Exynos 9609
Single-Core	247	295
Multi-Core	1115	1299

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 960	Exynos 9609
Frequency	2400 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	16 nm	10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1866
Memory bandwidth	28.8
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	64 KB
L2 cache	4 MB
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 960 is 8% better than Exynos 9609 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G71 MP8	Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency	1037 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	282	161
# of Cores	8	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		25.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	21.1	25.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	36.9	51.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	23.8	26.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	18.5	20.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	22.5	35.9
Real Racing 3	46.1	90.7
Sniper 3D	81.2	82.9
Need for Speed No Limits	51.7	62.2
Mortal Kombat X	59	75.1
CSR Racing 2	40.6	62.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	24 MP
Dual Camera resolution		16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	120
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem		LTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed	600 MBit/s.	600 MBit/s.
Upload speed	150 MBit/s.	150 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 960 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9609 is better: 23
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Kirin 960 and Exynos 9609, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 960 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 960 specs and review.

Exynos 9609 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Exynos 9609 specs and review.