Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Helio P22T vs Samsung Exynos 9609 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Helio P22T vs Samsung Exynos 9609

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Helio P22T vs Samsung Exynos 9609, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G72 MP3 and PowerVR GE8320.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Helio P22T is octa-core (Cortex-A53) and Exynos 9609 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A73). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like PassMark, Neocore, Octane V2, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, Vellamo, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Helio P22T or Exynos 9609 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

 
MediaTek Helio P22T
Samsung Exynos 9609

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Helio P22T6% Exynos 960910%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Helio P22T66% Exynos 960968%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Helio P22T5% Exynos 96098%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Helio P22T Exynos 9609
Total score86247144347
CPU2415640426
GPU3278354842
MEM1379923097
UX1552825980

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Helio P22T Exynos 9609
Single-Core223295
Multi-Core10041299

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Helio P22T Exynos 9609
Frequency2300 MHz2200 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography12 nm10 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration8x2.3 GHz Cortex-A534x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A73
4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)5 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR3, LPDDR4xLPDDR4
Max. MemoryLPDDR4(X) до 6GB, LPDDR3 до 4GB4 Gb
Memory Frequency2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz1866
Memory bandwidth14
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache32 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio P22T is 4% better than Exynos 9609 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G72 MP3
GPU Frequency650 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS126.8161
# of Cores23
# of Shader Units
Display1600 x 720 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile25.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)18.725.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra31.251.8
Call of Duty: Mobile19.926.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)15.820.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition18.335.9
Real Racing 346.890.7
Sniper 3D40.682.9
Need for Speed No Limits37.462.2
Mortal Kombat X49.975.1
CSR Racing 234.362.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution21 MP24 MP
Dual Camera resolution13 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS30120
Video Encoding resolutionFullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264, H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemLTE Cat.12/13 2/3CA
Download speed150 MBit/s.600 MBit/s.
Upload speed50 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio P22T is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9609 is better: 30
   You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Helio P22T and Exynos 9609, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio P22T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
Exynos 9609 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10


Helio P22T SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
• Vs MediaTek Helio G25
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T310
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Samsung Exynos 850
• Vs MediaTek Helio P40
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885
• Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)
• Vs Atom x5-Z8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953
• Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880
• Vs Atom x5-Z8350
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
• Vs MediaTek Helio P35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420
• Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
• Vs MediaTek MT8176
• Vs Atom x5-Z8550
• Vs MediaTek Helio P22
• Vs Atom x5-Z8500
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B
• Vs Atom x7-Z8700
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1
• Vs MediaTek MT6595M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
• Vs Allwinner A133
• Vs Unisoc SC79863a
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs MediaTek MT8766
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB


Exynos 9609 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Helio P65 (MT6768)
• Vs Kirin 659
• Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884
• Vs Tiger T310
• Vs Exynos 7 7904
• Vs Kirin 955
• Vs Helio G25
• Vs Kirin 950
• Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus
• Vs Exynos 850
• Vs Helio P40
• Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
• Vs Kirin 710F
• Vs Snapdragon 636
• Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
• Vs MediaTek Helio A25
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
• Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
• Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G35
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D)
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T610
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T606
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T616
• Vs MediaTek Helio G37
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek MT8168
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek MT8788
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands