|
MediaTek MT6739WM vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6739WM vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP2 and PowerVR GE8100. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6739WM is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as PassMark, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy MT6739WM or Exynos 7 Quad 7578 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT6739WM | 2% |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT6739WM | 30% |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | 55% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT6739WM | 1% |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6739WM |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | Total score | 34420 | 35491 | CPU | 9642 | 9946 | GPU | 13080 | 13477 | MEM | 5508 | 5678 | UX | 6201 | 6394 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6739WM |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | Single-Core | 91 | 94 | Multi-Core | 420 | 433 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6739WM |
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 | Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 3 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 7 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 384 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is 26% better than MT6739WM in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Mali-T720 MP2 | GPU Frequency | 570 MHz | 668 MHz | GFloPS | 11.2 | 22.71 | # of Cores | 1 | 2 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 10.1 | 10.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 27.1 | 27.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 18.4 | 17.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 15.5 | 14.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 23.4 | 23.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 35.1 | 35.2 | Real Racing 3 | 27.6 | 35.4 | Sniper 3D | 23.9 | 33.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 29.4 | 24.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 21.2 | 25.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 23.9 | 24.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, MPEG-4, VP8 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE Cat.4 2CA | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WM is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 is better: 26 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6739WM SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
Exynos 7 Quad 7578 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|